Trademark Rights as Fiduciary Guarantee in Banking Credit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v7i2.728Abstract
Development in the national economy is one of the efforts to achieve a just and prosperous society based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. In the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, the object of fiduciary guarantees is given a very broad explanation to include not only movable objects, both tangible and intangible, but also immovable objects and those that cannot be encumbered with dependent rights. Making intellectual rights the main guarantee in banking is certainly not an easy thing. All this is because in the Indonesian state it is still not possible to make a guarantee for intellectual property rights that have been guaranteed as the object of fiduciary guarantee This research is prepared with a normative juridical research method with a statue approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Although a brand can have economic value, it cannot make the brand the main guarantee, it can only be an additional guarantee. This is because brands cannot be guaranteed to exist to be used as the main guarantee in the banking sector. Legal protection against the imposition of fiduciary guarantees on intellectual property is becoming increasingly important in the context of an innovation-based economy. Fiduciary guarantees, which are regulated in Law No. 42 of 1999, allow creditors to obtain debt repayment through collateral objects that remain in the debtor's control.
Downloads
References
Adriliya, P. A., Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2024). Copyright Content on the YouTube Platform as Collateral for Creative Economy Financing. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 7991-8004. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1702
Angela, I. M., & Ariapramuda, S. D. (2021). Problematik Pelaksanaan Hak Cipta Atas Permainan Video Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Padjadjaran Law Review, 9(1).
Anggraini, B., & Turisno, B. E. (2023). Jaminan Fidusia Secara Online Dengan Objek Hak Cipta Dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Notarius, 16(1), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i1.33230
Ardini, A., & Sinambela, J. (2023). Penyelundupan Hukum Oleh Bank Melalui Klausul Cross Collateral Dan Cross Default Terhadap Perjanjian Kredit. Iblam Law Review, 3(2), 342-352. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v3i2.324
Bakhtiar, A., Rinawati, D. I., Pujotomo, D., Indra, I., & Handayani, P. R. (2020, March). Analysis of Motives that Affects Registrant and Patent Owners in Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 448, No. 1, p. 012036). IOP Publishing.
Choi, G. (2021). Toward a Central Bank Collateral Framework for ABMI. Korea Institute of Finance Working Paper. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3809426
Fauza, M. R., Santika, T., & Cintana, Z. (2022). Skema pembiayaan berbasis kekayaan intelektual: Peluang, tantangan dan solusi potensial terkait implementasinya. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum dan Masyarakat, 1(1).
Hikmia, Y. (2019). Hak Merek Sebagai Jaminan Tambahan Pada Perbankan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Airlangga).
Juzikienė, R. (2021). Problems of Legal Qualification of the Financial Collateral in Cash. Teisė, 118, 11-129. https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2021.118.7
Kaczorowska, M. (2019). Blockchain-based land registration: Possibilities and challenges. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 13(2), 339-360.
Mayana, R. F., Santika, T., & Cintana, Z. (2022). Peran Notaris Dalam Implementasi Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Bisnis Industri Kreatif Di Indonesia. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 6(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v6i1.1077
Meilaputri, I. G. A. D., Suryani, L. P., & Seputra, P. G. (2019). Kekuatan Hukum Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia yang Didaftarkan Setelah Terjadinya Wanprestasi. KERTHA WICAKSANA, 13(2), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.13.2.2019.69-72
Nurwati, S. H. (2024). Hak cipta karya musik dan lagu. Penerbit KBM Indonesia.
Pertiwi, N. A., & Sukirno, S. (2019). Pelaksanaan Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Notarius, 12(2), 924-930. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i2.29136
Rafli, M. A., Bachri, E., & Ramadan, S. (2023). Implementasi Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 Tentang Ekonomi Kreatif (Studi Pada Dirjen Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM Provinsi Lampung Dan Bank Indonesia. Journal Presumption of Law, 5(1), 87-108.
Rahman, A., Belas, J., Kliestik, T., & Tyll, L. (2017). Collateral requirements for SME loans: empirical evidence from the Visegrad countries. Journal of business economics and management, 18(4), 650-675. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1357050
Soraya, D. (2021). Legal Protection of Disadvantaged Debtor Customers in the Implementation of Object Execution Auction Procedures in Bank Credit Agreements. Indonesia Private Law Review, 2(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v2i1.2224
Tektona, R. I., & Mutiarachmah, U. (2021). Upaya Hukum Atas Penentuan Nilai Limit Lelang Oleh Bank Di Bawah Harga Pasar. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 4(2), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v4i2.9576
Tjoanda, M. (2020). Karakteristik Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.424
Umar, A. S. (2024). Kedudukan hak cipta sebagai hak kebendaan dan eksekusi jaminan fidusia atas hak cipta. Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Politik, 1(3), 28-41.
Wesna, P. A. S., Jusarata, I. B. D., & Kosasih, J. I. (2022). The Legal Consequences of Debtor Transfer Carried out under the Agreement, House Ownership Loans. Jurnal Hukum Prasada, 9(2), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.9.2.2022.86-97
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Economy and Management Study
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
